Considering that Locker should have starting Sunday over a limping Hasselback. I would start Locker, I understand what Munch is doing (Fisher 2.0) but I don't agree.
Considering that Locker should have starting Sunday over a limping Hasselback. I would start Locker, I understand what Munch is doing (Fisher 2.0) but I don't agree.
You need to trademark Fisher 2.0. BTW, I could agree with your more.
Munchak is doing what most NFL coaches would do. He's definitely not Fisher 2.0 though. He's demonstrated that multiple times by going for it on 4th instead of playing for field goals. He's also willing to try onside kicks in spots where Fisher wouldn't have. Not to mention, Munch makes coaching hires that Fisher wouldn't. That's why Fisher isn't the coach, and Munchak is. We wouldn't even have Locker OR Hasselbeck if Fisher was the coach. Anyway, probably not the right thread for this debate.
Personally, I'd play Locker from here on out.
This post was edited by owenstg on 12/21/2011 at 11:42 PM
I love how our coaching staff is doing this year. There have been a few setbacks, but overall, they have handled the turnover nicely.
At this point, we will more than likely not make the playoffs. Playing MH only hurts us for the future. Let Locker go in and make mistakes and learn from them. If he wins one or two games, it will provide nice momentum for the off season.
Is starting Hasselbeck against the Jags the right move?